 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re Elizabeth D., Docket: Yor-05-351,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, January 12, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Me. R. Civ. P. 62(a) permitted continued implementation and processing of child protective orders during an appeal. Trial court retained authority to conduct judicial reviews and enter appropriate orders and had authority to require department to maintain all services in place for mother, including supervised visitations during the appeal.
|
|||||
| EVEREST v. LEVITON MFG. CO., CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. CV-04-216,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, January 13, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Bonville v. Bonville, Docket: Yor-05-322,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, January 17, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court adopted ex-husband's proposed judgment in all respects except that it adopted ex-wife's proposed provision on spousal support. The fact that the trial court did not accept the husband's proposed spousal support language demonstrated that it not only carefully reviewed the proposal but compared it with the wife's proposed judgment.
|
|||||
| Brown v. Bangor Hous. Auth., CIVIL ACTION Docket No. AP-05-6,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, PENOBSCOT COUNTY, January 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Portland Water Dist. v. Inhabitants of Standish, CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. CV-04-363,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, January 17, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Dunn v. PUC, Docket: PUC-04-724,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, January 18, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: There was nothing unreasonable, unjust, or unlawful in commission's decision to allow, pursuant to 65-407-650 Me. Code R. § 2(A), (G) (1999), a utility company to rationally plan for expansion of its services, and to collect reinforcement fees from customers who presented the increased demand that led to need for reinforcement of water mains.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
