 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Guardianship of Autumn S., Docket: Wal-05-646,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, January 11, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although a mother argued that the probate court should have terminated a guardianship for her two children by granting her motion for a judgment as a matter of law, because the mother's motion was not renewed at the close of all of the evidence, the probate court was not obligated to reconsider the motion.
|
|||||
| Jipson v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co., Docket: And-06-189,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, January 11, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because an insured's underinsured motorist case against an insurer was voluntarily dismissed, and because the amount of the insured's total damages was not presented, nothing in this record suggested that a decision would provide the insured relief; consequently, there was no justiciable case or controversy entitling the insured to relief.
|
|||||
| Juliano v. Ameri-Cana Transp., Docket: WCB-06-1,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, January 11, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment by the Maine Workers' Compensation Board was vacated, and the case was remanded because an insurance guaranty association, which replaced an insolvent insurer on an employee's first injury claim, under Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 24-A, § 4435(4), was not responsible for the subrogation claim of the insurer on the employee's later claims.
|
|||||
| STATE v. VEILLEUX, CRIMINAL ACTION DOCKET NO. CR-06-391,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, KENNEBEC COUNTY, January 12, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Bruesewitz v. Grant, Docket: Cum-06-182,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, January 16, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Client's appeal of the denial of his motion to quash a disclosure subpoena to him and dismiss a disclosure proceeding was interlocutory, and since the case did not fall within one of the three exceptions to the final judgment rule, his appeal of the denial was dismissed.
|
|||||
| Carson v. Spearin, CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. CV-05-66,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, YORK COUNTY, January 16, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Clearwater Artesian Well Co. v. LaGrandeur, Docket: Yor-06-246,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, January 16, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Foreign corporation was presumed to have complied with Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 13-C, § 1502 and other statutory conditions to its right to conduct business in Maine. Property owner did not meet burden of establishing that there was a dispute as to whether corporation was authorized to maintain its action, and summary judgment was proper.
|
|||||
| Currie v. Indus. Sec., Inc., Docket: Aro-05-176,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, January 16, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment grant to employer and mill owner on security guard's claims his discharge violated Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 5, § 4551 et seq., and Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 26, § 831 et seq., and that mill owner tortiously interfered with contractual relationship was error, as factual dispute existed regarding each of those claims.
|
|||||
| EZZY v. CITY OF AUGUSTA, CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO AP-06-25,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, KENNEBEC COUNTY, January 16, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
