 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| PEERLESS INS. CO. v. MAINE BUR. OF INS., CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO: AP-05-032,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, January 27, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Runnells v. Quinn, Docket: Yor-05-249,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, January 27, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in granting partial summary judgment to the contractor on the homeowner's claim pursuant to the Home Construction Contract Act, Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 1486-1490 (Act); by proving his quantum meruit claim, the contractor also effectively proved he violated the Act, and a remedy had to be determined.
|
|||||
| TEDESCHI v. TRUMAN, CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. CV-04-584,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, January 27, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| WAITE v. MAINE HHS, CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. AP-03-023; AP-03-053,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, January 27, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| MOZINGO v. STANLEY MED. RESEARCH INST. & MATTHEW CYR, DOCKET NO. CV-05-186,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, KENNEBEC COUNTY, January 28, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Soucy, Docket: Ken-04-620,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, January 30, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant stipulated to prior conviction and understood that this qualified him as a dangerous sexual offender, the prerequisite of pleading and proving that defendant was a repeat sexual assault offender under Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 17A, § 1252(4-B) was met, and trial court was authorized to sentence defendant to any term of years.
|
|||||
| SHERBERT v. REMMELL, CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO: CV-05-660,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, January 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Pinkham v. Rite Aid of Me., Inc., Docket: Han-05-241,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, February 1, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In employee's disability discrimination suit, summary judgment was improperly granted to employer since components of essential functions of employee's job as cashier, which was necessary to determining whether employee was qualified individual with disability under Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 5, § 4553(8-D)(B), were factual matters in dispute.
|
|||||
| MAZZAGLIA v. STATE, CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. AP-05-014,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, February 3, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
