 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| SMITH v. SOUTHERN MAINE COMM COMMUNITY COLLEGE, CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. AP-03-62,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, February 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| SPURWINK CORP. v. CARLSON, CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. CV-06-038,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, February 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Conservatorship of Anthony D. G., Docket: Pen-06-315,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, February 6, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Conservator's petition for withdrawal of funds from a minor's estate under Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 18-A, § 5-425(a) to bury his father set forth a reason that, when viewed in most favorable light, may have been consistent with beneficiary's best interest. Trial court exceeded bounds of its discretion by denying petition without explanation.
|
|||||
| E. PERRY IRON & METAL CO v. CITY OF PORTLAND, CIVIL ACTION DOCKET CV-04-720,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, February 6, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Marcus S., Docket: Som-06-402,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, February 6, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court's findings terminating a mother's parental rights pursuant to Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 22, § 4055 was supported by competent record evidence showing, inter alia, that the mother was unable or unwilling to care for her children in time suited to meet their needs due to her near complete abdication of her reunification obligations.
|
|||||
| State v. Martin, Docket: Sag-06-203,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, February 6, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court's instruction constituted accurate statement of law combining Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 29-A, §§ 2073 and 2074 (2006). As accurate statement of law, instruction did not constitute any kind of missive to jury, nor did trial court encourage jury to find defendant guilty without regard to State's burden of proof as to defendant's intent.
|
|||||
| State v. Snow, Docket: Ken-06-146,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, February 6, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although substance of testimony was apparent from context, theory on which testimony was admissible was not. It was not clear that defendant intended to use testimony solely to impeach victim. Because defendant failed to make explicit offer of proof as to admissibility, he failed to preserve issue for appeal under Me. R. Evid. 103(a)(2).
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
