 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Middlesex Mut. Assur. Co. v. Handler M.D. & Eleanor B., CIVIL ACTION Docket No. CV-05-358,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, February 7, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Toomey v. Town of Frye Island, CIVIL ACTION Docket No. AP-05-81,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, February 7, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Cyr v. Madawaska Sch. Dep't, Docket: Aro-06-278,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, February 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Comments on role, background, and performance of members of school administration involved in a particular controversy were exact material contemplated by Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 20-A, § 6101(2)(B). Thus, those parts of a report prepared by an outside source and submitted to a school department were confidential and not subject to disclosure.
|
|||||
| Foley v. Leader Props., CIVIL ACTION Docket No. CV-05-658,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, February 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Penney v. State, CIVIL ACTION Docket No. AP-05-037,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, February 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Yoder v. Yoder, Docket: Som-06-308,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, February 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Findings of abuse in a protection from abuse proceeding, Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 19-A, §§ 4001-4014 (2006), were not essential to the determination of the contested issue of possession of the parties' farm because the parties, with the approval of the court, had agreed that the issue could be decided without findings of abuse.
|
|||||
| State v. Winterwood Acres, CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. CV-06-339,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, YORK COUNTY, February 9, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Keniston v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, Docket: Cum-06-215,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, February 13, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Under circumstances in which a transferee was added as a party defendant to a dispute between an owner and a bank, but had not been substituted for the bank and may have been entitled to the judgments obtained by the bank, there were further issues, and trial court's orders on summary judgment motions were not final for purposes of appeal.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
