 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bradbury v. Bradbury, Docket: Pen-05-64,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, March 29, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court properly refused to take a 56-year-old former husband's Social Security benefits into account when distributing marital property. Although the former wife's Maine State Retirement System benefits were divided, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding the husband's potential benefits too speculative to consider.
|
|||||
| Depot v. Depot, Docket: And-04-514,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, March 29, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court erred in awarding a wife a portion of the parties' marital assets in order to offset the Social Security benefits that the husband was expected to receive, as such violated 42 U.S.C.S. § 407(a); however, such benefits could be considered in equitably distributing the property pursuant to Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 19-A, § 953 (2005).
|
|||||
| HILL v. SHAW BROS. CONSTR., INC., CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. CV-05-057,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, YORK COUNTY, March 29, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Austin T., Docket: Aro-05-580,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, March 29, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: No child protection order under Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 22, § 4035 was necessary to give a district court jurisdiction over a mother's petition to terminate a father's parental rights under Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 22, § 4052(1). The mother's court order of custody under Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 19-A, § 1653 was sufficient.
|
|||||
| Kwasnik v. HHS, Docket: Cum-05-486,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, March 29, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| LINCOLN RENTAL SYS. v. LINCOLN SANITARY DIST., CIVIL ACTION Docket No. CV-04-203,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, PENOBSCOT COUNTY, March 29, 2006, Decided , March 29, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Gray, Docket: And-04-461,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, March 29, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's 40-year sentence for gross sexual assault, attempted murder, and arson after his attack on a 76-year-old neighbor was not an abuse of discretion or excessive under Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 17-A, § 1252-C in spite of his brain damage. Multiple aggravating factors, public safety, and the gravity of the offense were properly considered.
|
|||||
| TOWN OF TURNER v. WHITMAN, CIVIL ACTION Docket No. CV-04-168,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, ANDROSCOGGIN COUNTY, March 29, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
