 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Morganstern v. Mercy Hosp., CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. CV-06-565,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, March 27, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Pillsbury v. Pillsbury, Docket: Yor-06-25,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, March 27, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in its award of spousal support to the wife; even though it adequately satisfied each of the four divorce judgment requirements in Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 19-A, § 951-A(1), it erred in determining that parties' marriage was for 12 years because length of marriage was determined as of the date of the filing of the divorce action.
|
|||||
| Levesque v. Front St. Assocs., CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. CV-06-023,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, YORK COUNTY, March 28, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Morest v. Andrews, CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. RE-05-120,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, YORK COUNTY, March 28, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Woodfall v. Seacoast Assocs., CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. RE-06-014,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, YORK COUNTY, March 28, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Hollenberg v. Town of Union, Docket: Kno-06-331,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, March 29, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As an artificially formed body of water could constitute a "pond" for purposes of Union, Me., Land Use Ordinance § 10.3.8.5 (June 19, 2000), a town planing board erred in granting approval for a proposed development that did not satisfy the pond setback requirement therein; the pond had been formed from a water-filled quarry.
|
|||||
| Martin Brown v. Sunrise Expeditions Int'l, CIVIL ACTION NO.: CV-06-123,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, PENOBSCOT COUNTY, March 29, 2007, Decided , March 29, 2007, Filed and Entered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Molleur v. Dairyland Ins. Co., CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. CV-06-04,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, YORK COUNTY, March 29, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
