 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Camp v. Inhabitants of Shapleigh, CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. AP-06-022,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, YORK COUNTY, March 30, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Fisher v. Johnson, CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. RE-06-185,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, YORK COUNTY, March 30, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Lin-Cor Envtl. v. State Tax Assessor, CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. AP-06-69,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, KENNEBEC COUNTY, March 30, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Halco v. Davey, Docket: Kno-06-428,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, April 3, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court erred in dismissing an individual's breach of contract claim where the sheriff's description of the settlement as a "payoff" and the commissioner's statement that the settlement "wasn't very much" revealed the agreement's nature and other statements to the media could have suggested that the individual's claim was frivolous.
|
|||||
| E. Perry Iron & Metal Co. v. City of Portland, CIVIL ACTION Docket No. CV-04-720,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, April 9, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Merrill v. Town of Durham, Docket: And-06-74,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, April 10, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Town board of appeals properly denied a building permit to property owners, as the lot in question was by definition a back lot pursuant to a town ordinance, and the lot was thus not exempt from the provisions of the ordinance, and the lot did not meet the minimum requirements for development under the ordinance.
|
|||||
| State v. Gorneault, Docket: Aro-06-420,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, April 10, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Stop of defendant's vehicle was not improper under Me. Const. art. I, § 5 because police were stopping every vehicle passing through the area where a burglary had recently been committed to obtain information, the stop was very brief, the questions were limited to the burglary, and the purpose of the stop was only to ask about the burglary.
|
|||||
| Waterhouse v. Kelleher, Docket: Ken-06-481,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, April 10, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
