 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| J. R. BELAIR & CO. v. MAINE TURF & GREENERY, INC., CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. CV-06-66,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, April 27, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Christian Fellowship & Renewal Ctr. v. Town of Limington, Docket: Yor-04-654,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, April 28, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: County commissioners erred in denying an organization's request for a property tax exemption pursuant to Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 36, § 652(1)(A), (C) (2005), as they erred in finding that the organization's religious nature and incidental, non-charitable activities on the property were an absolute bar to qualifying for a charitable exemption.
|
|||||
| LAPLANTE-MASKARINETZ v. COOK, CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. CV-05-682,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, April 28, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| PUTNAM v. MAINE BD. OF LICENSURE FOR FORESTERS, CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. AP-05-24,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, KENNEBEC COUNTY, April 28, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Cobb, Docket: Pen-04-223,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, April 28, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The 25-year sentence imposed following defendant's convictions of robbery, burglary, and other crimes, did not violate Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 17-A, § 1252(2)(A), as the version of the statute in effect at the time of the crimes did not require that a jury determine whether defendant's criminal history warranted the enhanced sentence.
|
|||||
| Wells v. Harbor House Cmty. Serv. Ctr., CIVIL ACTION Docket No. CV-04-87,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, HANCOCK COUNTY, April 28, 2006, Decided, April 28, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Wiley v. Wiley, Docket: Yor-05-424,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, May 1, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in finding that father harassed his daughter and in entering protection from harassment order because the conduct that the father engaged in--showing up for his scheduled visitation, calling or writing, and attending school events--was protected by law. Therefore, it was not harassment under Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 5, § 4651(2).
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
