 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| MacDowall v. MMG Ins. Co., Docket: Som-06-181,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, May 1, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment against insurance company in reach and apply action under Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 24-A, § 2904 was proper because insurance company had the opportunity to remove default against insured motorist in underlying action, and also had opportunity to contest damages. Those opportunities were sufficiently meaningful to satisfy due process.
|
|||||
| Bernier v. Hanson, CIVIL ACTION Docket No. RE-07-52,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, May 2, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Darling's v. Ford Motor Co., CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. AP-05-52,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, KENNEBEC COUNTY, May 2, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ljunggren v. Bureau of Human Res., CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. CV-06-296,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, KENNEBEC COUNTY, May 2, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
