 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| R.C. Moore v. Les-Care Kitchens, CIVIL ACTION Docket No. CV-04-390,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, May 5, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| E. Perry Iron & Metal Co. v. City of Portland, Docket: Cum-05-193,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, May 8, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court's decision on a count seeking review of a city's permit denial was not final order where challenge to the validity of an ordinance and request for declaratory and injunctive relief were not addressed. Final judgment determination under Me. R. Civ. P. 54(b) was not dependent on conceptual relationship between the various claims.
|
|||||
| Hannum v. Bd. of Envtl. Prot., Docket: Han-05-159,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, May 8, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Expert testimony that increased boat traffic resulting from a dock in coastal wetlands would harm aquatic wildlife in the vicinity, including seals and a tern nesting colony, was sufficient evidence to support the denial by the Maine Board of Environmental Protection of a permit to build the dock under the Maine Natural Resources Protection Act.
|
|||||
| Winifred B. French Corp. v. Pleasant Point Passamaquoddy Reservation, Docket: Was-06-62,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, May 8, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because defendant reservation was not acting in its municipal capacity when it entered into a lease, the Freedom of Access Act, Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 1, §§ 401-410 (2005), did not apply, and judgment was properly entered in favor of the reservation on plaintiff newspapers' request for documents and access to reservation meetings.
|
|||||
| CLOUTIER v. SAVARD, CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. CV-03-045,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, ANDROSCOGGIN COUNTY, May 9, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Franklin Printing v. Harvest Hill Press, Docket: Han-05-536,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, May 9, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A court did not err in denying defendant's motion for relief from judgment because the denial of the motion for relief from judgment worked no plain and unmistakable injustice, nor did the court exceed its discretion in denying the motion pursuant to Me. R. Civ. P. 60(b).
|
|||||
| MAIETTA CONSTR., INC. v. STATE TAX ASSESSOR, CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. AP-05-009,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, May 9, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| S. Portland Police Patrol Ass'n v. City of S. Portland, Docket: Cum-05-555,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, May 9, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court did not err in granting the city's motion for summary judgment because the report sought by city police associations, as it pertained to the deputy police chief, was a confidential record and was not subject to public disclosure pursuant to Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 30-A, § 2702(1)(B)(5).
|
|||||
| Wells v. Anthem Health Plans of Maine, Inc., Civil Action Docket No. CV-04-574,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, May 9, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
