 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. McNally, Docket: Aro-06-154,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, May 24, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the verdict form created a serious potential for juror misunderstanding regarding the reasonable doubt standard and defendant's right to be presumed innocent, the error was treated as obvious under Me. R. Crim. P. 52(b) and his conviction for unlawful sexual contact was vacated.
|
|||||
| Abbott v. Inhabitants of Sanford, CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. AP-07-03,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, YORK COUNTY, May 29, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Decambra v. Carson, CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. CV-05-246,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, YORK COUNTY, May 29, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Rodriguez v. Town of Moose River, Docket: Som-06-554,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, May 29, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A town clerk was not immune for an alleged injury incurred when she did official business from her home, because her choice not to replace a handrail (1) was no policy decision, and (2) was not intentional. A town was not immune because the home fell under the public building exception to immunity in Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 14, § 8104-A(2) (2006).
|
|||||
| Tri-Town Marine, Inc. v. J.C. Milliken Agency, Inc., Docket: Was-06-316,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, May 29, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment for insurance agency was proper in insured's claim asserting failure to procure adequate insurance coverage because insured failed to allege sufficient facts to establish causation and failed to show that it would have acted in a substantially different way in light of the increased risk absent type of coverage it sought.
|
|||||
| Me. Ass'n of Health Plans v. Superintendent of Ins., Docket: Cum-06-519,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, May 31, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Absent definition of phrase "aggregate measurable cost savings" in Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 24-A, § 6913(a)(1) and legislative intent as to how it should be interpreted, court deferred to agency's reading of ambiguous statute to include savings realized through broader act that created health insurance program because interpretation was reasonable.
|
|||||
| Me. Educ. Ass'n v. Me. Cmty. College Sys. Bd. of Trs., Docket: Ken-05-552,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, May 31, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judicial estoppel barred association's motion for relief from judgment confirming arbitration award and to remand to arbitrator because initially, association asserted that it did not want award remanded, neither party timely sought to vacate, amend, or clarify award, and association's current position was inconsistent with its earlier position.
|
|||||
| Mortgage Elec. Registration Sys. v. Flynn, CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO: RE07-009,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, June 1, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Genujolok Beteiligungs Gmbh v. Zorn, Civil Action Docket No. CV-06-183,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, June 4, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
