 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Brown v. HHS, Docket: Aro-05-545,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, June 2, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: It was error for a state agency to conclude that it could not take into consideration the financial ability of a husband and wife to pay for a meal service when it denied them eligibility to a meals on wheels program, because the inability to pay for an alternative could be considered as a lack of the support needed to obtain meals.
|
|||||
| GARVEY v. TOWN OF WELLS, CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO: AP-05-036,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, YORK COUNTY, June 2, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, INC. v. FLEET ELEC. SERVS., DOCKET NO. CV-05-313,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, June 2, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| OSGOOD v. C.U. YORK INS. CO., CIVIL ACTION Docket No. CV-04-568,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, June 5, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Lakin, Docket: And-05-393 and And-05-406,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, June 6, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because defendants each testified and asserted that the other was primarily responsible for the victim's death, and because the jury received a limiting instruction, neither defendant was prejudiced by the trial court's denial of their Me. R. Crim. P. 8(d) motions to sever their trials.
|
|||||
| PEET v. PEET, CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO: CV-04-767,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, June 8, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. York, Docket: Cum-05-376,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, June 8, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Vehicle could have been used as a weapon. Defendant's use of his van in driving alongside victim's vehicle, making contact with victim's vehicle, and pushing victim's vehicle into heavy oncoming traffic was sufficient to establish conviction for reckless conduct with the use of dangerous weapon, Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 17-A, § 211 (2005).
|
|||||
| DOW v. STATE, CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. AP-05-68,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, KENNEBEC COUNTY, June 9, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
