 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Fournier v. Aetna, Inc., Docket: WCB-05-471,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, June 16, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An employee's claim was not barred by the going and coming rule where the employee was injured when she fell on a common stairway after returning from lunch at a building which housed the employer's business.
|
|||||
| Patrons Oxford Ins. Co. v. Harris, Docket: Pen-04-636,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, June 16, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Accident victim, who entered into a stipulation for entry of judgment in a personal injury action with the driver of an insured truck, could recover damages from an insurer under Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 24-A, § 2904 because the driver was covered under a policy as he could have reasonably believed that he was given permission to operate the truck.
|
|||||
| Jabar v. Jabar, Docket: Cum-05-516,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, June 19, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of husband's motion to decrease child support was proper because evidence supported findings that, inter alia, wife retained primary residence of the children, had more time with the children, and that the parties did not provide substantially equal care for the children pursuant to Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 19-A, § 2006(5)(D-1).
|
|||||
| Payne v. Payne, Docket: Sag-05-423,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, June 19, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court's findings that the annual income of a husband in a divorce proceeding was $ 70,000, inclusive of his Navy benefits, was clearly erroneous. Husband's monthly housing and sustenance allowances, and the fact that, as a Florida resident, he paid no state income tax, did not support the finding as to the husband's income.
|
|||||
| State v. Pierce, Docket: Kno-05-337,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, June 19, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Convictions for Class B trafficking and Class C conspiracy were affirmed because more than 20 pounds of marijuana could be attributed to defendant by inferring that the 11.96 pounds of plant material stripped by the police would have been sold. Forfeiture of $145,000 in cash was warranted under Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 15, §§ 5821, 5826.
|
|||||
| MONTGOMERY v. CAIRNS, CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. CV-04-342,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, June 20, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Perry, Docket: Oxf-05-47,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, June 20, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Transporting a bear out of the state was not a civil violation at the time of the occurrence because Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 12, § 7452(14) (1994) had been repealed. Thus, it could not have been a crime for a guide to assist a client in transporting a bear into New Hampshire.
|
|||||
| Clifford v. Cues Inc., CIVIL ACTION Docket No. CV-06-6,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, PENOBSCOT COUNTY, June 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
