 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| St. John v. Jeffrey Jordan & S. Portland, CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO: CV07-045,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, June 29, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Windham Land v. Jeffords, CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. RE-07-077,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, June 29, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Lewis v. Hannaford Bros. Co., CIVIL ACTION Docket No. CV-06-113,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, July 2, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Lemay v. Town of Berwick, CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. AP-07-020,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, YORK COUNTY, July 3, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Daniel G. Lilley Law Office v. Aquavision, CIVIL ACTION Docket No. CV-06-259,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, July 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Hess v. Hess, Docket: Pen-06-100,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, July 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The fact that a husband's property became subject to attachment after his divorce did not require a new trial nor amended judgment, because the trial court was aware of the other litigation and liability exposure, and the trial court acted within its discretion in assigning the contingent debt to husband based on his alleged wrongdoing.
|
|||||
| Libby v. State, Docket: Cum-06-511,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, July 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sentence of 40 years for murder under former Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 17-A, § 1251 did not violate plaintiff's Sixth Amendment right to have a jury determine, beyond a reasonable doubt, facts that increased his sentence because statute provided sentencing range of 25 years to life imprisonment, and 40-year sentence was well within statutory range.
|
|||||
| N. Sebago Shores, LLC v. Mazzaglia, Docket: Cum-06-245,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, July 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment in favor of a trust on owners' suit seeking a declaration that the trust's swim area line interfered with the owners' easement rights to a beach area was proper because plain, unambiguous language of easement did not encompass right to access area by boat, but, rather, limited scope of easement to swimming and sunbathing.
|
|||||
| State v. Maynard, Docket: Aro-06-421,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, July 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Admission, in defendant's trial for obstructing criminal prosecution, of girlfriend's statement given in connection with protective order complaint was proper under Me. R. Evid. 801(d)(1)(A) because, inter alia, protection from abuse order was an "official proceeding," and the girlfriend was subject to cross-examination at defendant's trial.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
