 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Conway Lake Resorts, Inc. v. Quisisana Resort, Docket: Oxf-05-292,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, June 22, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Alteration in character and quality of use was a change of use. Buyer's application to convert 60 percent of restaurant space into 9 additional hotel units, increasing total units to 21, involved change from existing non-conforming use to another non-conforming use, and thus zoning board of appeals properly exercised jurisdiction on application.
|
|||||
| McLaughlin v. DeLodge, CIVIL ACTION Docket No. CV-05-60,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, PENOBSCOT COUNTY, June 27, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Pearson v. Freeport Sch. Dep't, Docket: WCB-05-473,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, June 27, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A school district did not violate the 14-day rule of 90-351-1 Code Me. R. § 1 because it filed a notice of controversy that was sufficient to cover a teacher's continuous injury. The teacher's notice to a principal several months earlier that she suffered from depression and work-related stress was not a claim for workers' compensation benefits.
|
|||||
| Voorhees v. Sagadahoc County, Docket: Ken-05-268,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, June 28, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Probate judge who had been continuously reelected to his officer in four-year terms since 1992 had served in a continuance of office as contemplated by the Compensation Clause, Me. Const. art. VI, § 2, and the judge's compensation could not be reduced by the county commissioners at the end of the elected term.
|
|||||
| Advanced Constr. Corp. v. Sanzaro, CIVIL ACTION Docket No. CV-04-175,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, PENOBSCOT COUNTY, June 29, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| FIRST STEP LAND DEV. v. TOWN OF KITTERY, CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. AP-06-06,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, YORK COUNTY, July 5, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| LINDSEY GREENE CONDO. ASS'N v. ALLAIN, CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. RE-04-028,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, YORK COUNTY, July 5, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
