 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Advanced Constr. Corp. v. Pilecki, Docket: Pen-05-315,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, July 13, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment was affirmed because the president of a construction company could be found personally liable for an abuse of process claim under Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 1212 for engaging in a deceptive trade practice based on his participation in filing a mechanic's lien which contained misstatements and was filed for an improper purpose.
|
|||||
| Yeadon Fabric Domes, Inc. v. Me. Sports Complex, LLC, Docket: Pen-05-305,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, July 13, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court's order of priority of creditors was affirmed as Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 4012 was inapplicable. Thus, pursuant to Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 11, § 9-1334(3), a manufacturer's perfected security interest in a sports complex dome which it sold to the debtor was subordinate to the mechanic's liens of the engineer and the contractor.
|
|||||
| MAKARA MENG v. VANN, CIVIL ACTION Docket No. RE-06-3,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, July 14, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| V & C Enters. v. City of S. Portland, CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. AP-05-85,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, July 14, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| ARSENAULT v. MAGNA HOSPITALITY GROUP, CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. AP-05-08,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, KENNEBEC COUNTY, July 17, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Kilroy v. Northeast Sunspaces, Inc., CIVIL ACTION Docket No. CV-04-152,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, PENOBSCOT COUNTY, July 17, 2006, Filed and Entered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Davric Me. Corp. v. Scott, CIVIL ACTION Docket No. CV-05-580,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, July 18, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| River Dale Ass'n v. Bloss, Docket: Yor-05-344,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, July 18, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although a developer confirmed that a restrictive covenant in an owner's deed did not prohibit modular homes, it was unclear whether he would have considered vinyl siding to be "equal" to the sidings listed in the covenant; therefore, the grant of summary judgment was affirmed in part and vacated in part.
|
|||||
| Small v. Durango, CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. CV-05-668,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, July 18, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
