 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Rankin v. Jewett, CIVIL ACTION Docket No. CV-04-405,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, PENOBSCOT COUNTY, August 1, 2006, Decided , August 1, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Td Banknorth v. Bros., CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO: CV-05-553,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, August 1, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Creamer v. Bishop, Docket: Oxf-06-15,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, August 2, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Sargent v. Braun, Docket: Han-05-559,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, August 2, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A father's motion to modify an order of parental rights and responsibilities was improperly denied because the mother's abusive relationship and move constituted a substantial change of circumstances requiring an analysis of the best interest factors of Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 19-A, § 1653(3), which the trial court's findings failed to address.
|
|||||
| Saunders v. Tisher, Docket: Pen-05-208,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, August 2, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Psychiatrist's alleged actions in causing patient to be involuntarily committed to mental hospital implicated psychiatrist's capacity as health care provider or practitioner, and fell within ambit of Maine Health Security Act (MHSA), Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, §§ 2501-2987. Thus, suit was time barred by MHSA's three year statute of limitations.
|
|||||
| Bank of Am. v. Finnemore, Docket: Pen-05-464,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, August 3, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Me. Assoc. of Health Plans v. State, CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO: AP-05-090, 095, 096,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, August 4, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Wood v. Bell, Docket: Cum-05-251,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, August 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court's quieting title to a buyer regarding land was vacated, and the verdict of the jury quieting title to a neighbor was reinstated as substantial evidence existed for the jury to find that the neighbor possessed the land under adverse possession. Further, the court erred by instructing the jury to disregard evidence on forfeiture value.
|
|||||
| State v. Miller, CRIMINAL ACTION DOCKET NO. CR-05-540,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, KENNEBEC COUNTY, August 11, 2006, Decided , August 11, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
