 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Hains v. City of Portland, Civil Action Docket No. AP-05-015,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, August 28, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Lauze v. Town of Harpswell, Civil Action Docket No. AP-05-079,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, August 28, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Portland Water Dist. v. Town of Standish, Docket: Cum-05-644,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, August 28, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As common law doctrine, nullum tempus occurrit regi ("time does not run against the king"), prohibited the taking of government land by prescriptive easement, and quasi-municipal special purpose water district created by State of Maine was a governmental entity, court properly refused to grant public a prescriptive easement over district's land.
|
|||||
| State v. Tozier, Docket: Han-05-634,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, August 28, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An investigatory stop did not violate defendant's Fourth Amendment rights because a state trooper had a reasonable articulable suspicion of criminal conduct when he noticed the male driver of a pickup, checked its registration, found that defendant owned it and that his license was suspended, and stopped him on suspicion that he was the driver.
|
|||||
| LDC Gen. Contr. v. LeBlanc, Docket: Yor-05-593,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, August 29, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: At trial in an employer's action alleging that a former employee made personal charges on its credit card, the admission of lists of charges violated Me. R. Evid. 1006 when original records were never provided. The lists and annotated invoices were inadmissible as business records because they were not prepared in the regular course of business.
|
|||||
| R.F. Jordan & Sons v. P.M. Mackay & Sons, Docket No. RE-03-32,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, HANCOCK COUNTY, August 30, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
