 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Estate of Dineen, Docket: Yor-05-554,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, August 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Probate court finding that the interest on two mortgages an heir owed an estate was to accrue interest and that the mortgages were not to be satisfied with estate funds until the final settlement was affirmed as the evidence supported the court's finding that the personal representative's actions were motivated by a desire to benefit the estate.
|
|||||
| Fleet Nat'l Bank v. Mayeux, Civil Action Docket No. CV-03-247,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, August 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Watts, Docket: Sag-05-362,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, August 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in granting defendant's new trial motion as a juror's discussion of her prior consensual sexual experience during deliberations in the sexual assault case, coupled with her congratulatory phone call to the prosecutor after the case was completed, provide an insufficient basis to overturn the verdict under Me. R. Evid. 606(b).
|
|||||
| Viles v. Town of Embden, Docket: Som-05-521,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, August 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Superior court's approval of a planning board's revocation of a building permit was affirmed because the court did not abuse its discretion when it found that a neighbor demonstrated good cause for his untimely appeal. Further, because the property was not a nonconforming lot of record, the building permit should not have been issued.
|
|||||
| Doughty v. State Farm Ins. Co., CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO: CV-05-680,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, September 1, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Dow v. Dickinson, CIVIL ACTION Docket No. RE-05-183,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, September 1, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Five Liver Co. v. City of Portland, CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. CV-02-410,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, September 5, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Holland v. City of Biddeford, CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. CV-03-071,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, YORK COUNTY, September 6, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
