 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| THOMPSON v. TOWN OF STANDISH, CIVIL ACTION DOCKET AP-05-055,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, October 30, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Connelly v. Doucette, Docket: Pen-06-192,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, October 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motorist did not have sufficient contacts to support Maine jurisdiction under Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 14, § 704-A to hear suit arising from New Hampshire traffic accident. Combination of the motorist's prior trips to Maine and his intent to enter Maine when the collision occurred did not amount to sufficient contact to support jurisdiction.
|
|||||
| Rodrigue v. Toulousse, LOCATION: AUGUSTA DOCKET NO. CV-05-116,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, KENNEBEC COUNTY, November 1, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Estate of Colburn, Docket: Pen-05-490,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, November 2, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Probate court order which, in part, found that son violated Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 18-A, § 3-712 (2005), and ordered him to repay corporation for payment made before decedent's death, was largely vacated because, since neither corporation nor son's wife were parties to probate proceeding claims should not have been addressed by the probate court.
|
|||||
| LaMarche v. Comm'n on Governmental Ethics, Docket: Ken-06-645,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, November 2, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Commission's decision that certain advertisements did not expressly advocate the election or defeat of a clearly identified candidate under Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 21-A, § 1019-B(1)(A) (2005) represented a reasonable interpretation of the applicable law, and the commission did not exceed the bounds of its discretion.
|
|||||
| McNeil v. Town of Standish, CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. AP-06-07,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, November 2, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Van Deventer v. Judson, LOCATION: AUGUSTA DOCKET NO. CV-05-119,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, KENNEBEC COUNTY, November 2, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| O'Brien v. Comm'r, DOCKET NO. AP-05-88,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, November 3, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
