 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bodack v. Town of Ogunquit, Docket: Yor-05-455,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, November 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An order vacating a planning board's decision to approve a proposed subdivision was affirmed because traffic studies indicated an adverse impact on the level of service, and because the board failed to make findings that it granted a waiver due to extraordinary and unnecessary hardships or special circumstances.
|
|||||
| Topliff v. El-Hajj, CIVIL ACTION Docket No. CV-06-9,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, PENOBSCOT COUNTY, November 7, 2006, Filed and Entered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Snow v. Portland Hous. Auth., CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. CV-06-71,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, November 8, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Cote, Docket: Yor-05-417,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, November 9, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction for operating under the influence, Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 29-A, § 2411(1) (1996) (repealed and replaced by § 2411(1-A) (2005)), was vacated as the district court improperly denied his motion for leave to file a late jury trial request; he was not appointed counsel until after time limit in Me. R. Crim. P. 22(a) had passed.
|
|||||
| Laurie Ford v. Shanoski, CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. CV-06-375,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, November 14, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| LePage v. Bath Iron Works Corp., Docket: And-05-692,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, November 14, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employer's letter to an employee that he was disqualified from carrying a hand gun was a discrete act, and the employee did not timely file his disability discrimination claim. The employee also failed to show that threats to fight him in court were sufficient to establish an adverse employment action in order to state a whistleblower claim.
|
|||||
| Lloyd v. Benson, Docket: Han-05-357,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, November 14, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although trial court's legal conclusion that there was no iron pipe at 1270 feet from the beginning point of the boundary line and that this created a latent ambiguity in a deed was in error, trial court's error did not undermine its ultimate conclusion that the northwestern boundary terminated at 1070 feet. Therefore, any error was harmless.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
