 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Dowling v. Bangor Hous. Auth., Docket: Pen-05-489,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, November 28, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A housing authority properly terminated a tenant's rental subsidy under 42 U.S.C.S. § 1437f based on her participation in an unauthorized side agreement with her landlord. Her participation in the side agreement merited the sanction, and it was proper to consider hearsay evidence under Me. R. Evid. 1101(b)(4) and 24 C.F.R. § 982.555.
|
|||||
| Estate of Silsby, Docket: Han-05-625,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, November 28, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Testamentary trustee was properly surcharged personally under former Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 18-A, § 7-306. The trustee knew that the will's language did not reflect the manner in which he distributed the assets, and he had proceeded without regard to the interests of a nephew's estate and without seeking instructions from the probate court.
|
|||||
| Mill Pond Condo. Ass'n v. Manalio, Docket: Yor-06-99,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, November 28, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in finding that space taken up by association's sign did not interfere with adjacent landowners' ingress or egress across easement. Because adjacent landowners' use was pursuant to their deeded title, it was not "adverse" to owner, and they did not satisfy elements required for adverse possession or prescriptive easement.
|
|||||
| State v. Lipham, Docket: Pen-06-172,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, November 28, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's subsequent voluntary admission to the police that he had killed the victim, albeit accidentally, was a sufficiently consistent disclosure pursuant to Me. R. Evid. 510 to waive any claim of privilege defendant may have had with respect to a recorded conversation defendant had with his wife.
|
|||||
| State v. Moores, Docket: Han-06-81,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, November 28, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the State's evidence, which consisted of testimony from the 13-year-old victim, was not inherently incredible and the victim's testimony did not contain any gross unexplained self-contradictions, defendant's unlawful sexual contact convictions under Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 17-A, §§ 255 and 255-A(1) were affirmed.
|
|||||
| Collabric, Inc. v. Me. Unemployment Ins. Comm'n, Docket No. AP-06-9,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, PENOBSCOT COUNTY, November 29, 2006, Decided , November 29, 2006, Filed and Entered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
