 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Estate of Barrows, Docket: Wal-06-120,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, December 19, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Language of prenuptial agreement and reference to death in affidavits created ambiguity that could not be resolved from four corners of the document, and should have resolved by extrinsic evidence. References in the agreement created a question as to whether the waiver applied to an elective share under Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 18-A, § 2-204.
|
|||||
| In re Doris G., Docket: Cum-06-90,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE, December 19, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The Department of Heath and Human Services' failure to file a joint reunification plan as required by Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 22, § 4041 (2005) did not prevent the termination of a father's parental rights when he did not cooperate with the Department to create a plan and the father was informed of his rehabilitation and reunification goals.
|
|||||
| Hall v. Unum-Provident Corp., CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO: CV06-238,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MAINE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, December 20, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
