 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Blasi v. State, No. 2633, September Term, 2004,
COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND, March 2, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In DUI case, Md. Code Ann., Transp. § 21-902(a)(1), trooper had sufficient grounds under Fourth Amendment to administer field sobriety tests to defendant at roadside during traffic stop as (1) trooper detected an odor of alcohol on him; (2) his eyes were bloodshot and glassy, and his speech was slurred; and (3) he admitted to having a few drinks.
|
|||||
| Grand Bel Manor Condo. v. Gancayco, No. 2529, September Term, 2004,
COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND, March 2, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: DPS's waiver of the parking requirements of Montgomery County, Md., Zoning Ordinance § 59-E-3.7 did not waive the parking requirements in Montgomery County, Md., Zoning Ordinance § 59-G-2.36(b)(5) as neither DPS nor the county board of appeals had the authority to waive the parking requirements of § 59-G-2.36(b)(5).
|
|||||
| Thompson v. State, No. 2783, September Term, 2004,
COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND, March 2, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant substantially complied with 45-days notice condition in Md. Code Ann., Cts. & Jud. Proc. § 10-915(c) that it sought to introduce DNA evidence. Since trial court had discretion to rule DNA evidence admissible under § 10-915(d) for substantial compliance with rule, trial court abused its discretion in finding that it could not admit DNA.
|
|||||
| DeBoy v. City of Crisfield, No. 244, September Term, 2005,
COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND, March 3, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The circuit court correctly concluded that a resident was a bare licensee when she injured herself on an owner and occupier's property, who thus did not owe a duty to make the premises reasonably safe; as resident was on premises for sole purpose of walking her dogs, she was not an implied invitee, but merely a licensee.
|
|||||
| Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. Wilson, No. 100, SEPTEMBER TERM, 2005,
COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND, March 3, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In dispute between employee and employer's insurer, fellow employee exclusion in auto policy was valid because it did not contravene public policy. Personal injury liability coverage was for minimum required by Md. Code Ann., Transp., § 17-103(b)(1), exclusion required coverage to statutory minimum, and employer had workers' compensation coverage.
|
|||||
| State Dep't of Assessments & Taxation v. Reier, No. 273, September Term, 2005,
COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND, March 3, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: After employee was terminated from his position as a county assessor, ALJ did not err in deciding previously determined facts because case had been remanded for ALJ to answer specific questions that might have gone to the merits of the matter under Md. Code Ann., State Pers. & Pens. § 11-106, but circuit court erred in reversing ALJ.
|
|||||
| Banashak v. Wittstadt, No. 0589, September Term, 2005,
COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND, March 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Orphans' court order denying caveators' motion to dismiss attorneys' fee petitions was not a final, appealable order under Md. Code Ann., Cts. & Jud. Proc. § 12-501 and, though the denial of a petition to transmit issues was normally immediately appealable, the issues sought to have been transmitted involved the fees and were subject to remand.
|
|||||
| Canaj, Inc. v. Baker & Div. Phase III, No. 72, September Term, 2005,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, March 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a delinquent taxpayer failed to set forth a claim of constructive fraud to vacate various judgments of foreclosure with regard to properties sold at a tax sale, the sales were upheld under Md. Code Ann., Tax-Prop. § 14-845, and the city was not required to cite the properties as abandoned or vacant in its order to proceed.
|
|||||
| Cottage City Mennonite Church, Inc. v. JAS Trucking, Inc., No. 618, September Term, 2005,
COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND, March 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Entry of final order establishing mechanic's lien pursuant to arbitration award against church's property and in favor of the subcontractor was not error; church's due process rights pursuant to Md. Const. Decl. Rights art. 24 were not violated, as church's failure to comply with statutory and procedural rules was what led court to establish lien.
|
|||||
| East Park Ltd. P'ship v. Larkin, No. 289, September Term, 2005,
COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND, March 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in determining collective fair value of withdrawing partners' interests in the limited partnership; "fair value" was a question of fact for trier of fact, its valuation was supported by competent and material evidence, and Md. Code Ann., Corps. & Ass'ns § 10-604 did not contemplate interest would be sold on open market.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
