 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Chaney v. State, No. 91, September Term, 2006,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, March 14, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Pursuant to Md. Code Ann., Crim. Proc. § 11-603, defendant was ordered to pay restitution to assault victim as condition of probation. This was plain error, as order had no evidentiary basis and defendant was never given opportunity to contest or defend against it; therefore, it was vacated despite defendant's failure to preserve issue for review.
|
|||||
| Dep't of Health & Mental Hygiene v. Kelly, No. 47, September Term, 2006,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, March 14, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Reversal of the decision approving the civil detainee's forcible medication was affirmed; Md. Code Ann., Health-Gen. § 10-708 required State to prove detainee involuntarily committed to State institution was danger to himself or others in context of his confinement within institution before forcible medication could occur, and that was not proven.
|
|||||
| Robey v. State, No. 90, September Term, 2006,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, March 14, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An order that defendant pay his assault victim $ 42,000 in restitution was not an illegal sentence, as the unambiguous language of former Md. Code Ann., Crim. Proc. § 11-604(b) (2001), which limited restitution payable by a child, the child's parent, or both, to $ 10,000, did not apply to adult defendants.
|
|||||
| Scherer Tax Serv. v. Dep't of Labor, Licensing & Regulation, No. 123, September Term 2006,
COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND, March 14, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Maryland Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation erred in not terminating claimant's unemployment benefits, as she rejected an offer of full-time, suitable employment without "good cause," within meaning of Md. Code Ann., Lab. and Empl. § 8-1005(a), since her sole reason for refusing job was that she wanted to find permanent employment.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
