 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Atty. Griev. Comm'n v. Iweanoge, Misc. Docket AG No. 12, September Term, 2005,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, March 22, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Fields v. State, No. 311, September Term, 2004,
COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND, March 30, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in admitting evidence of defendant's nickname listed on a screen at a bowling alley; since such evidence was not an "assertion" under Md. R. 5-801(a), it was not a statement under that subsection, was not hearsay under Md. R. 5-801(c), and was admissible non-hearsay evidence.
|
|||||
| Maxwell v. State, No. 1882, September Term, 2003,
COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND, March 30, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in entering a judgment of conviction finding defendant guilty of attempted second degree rape a crime, as the legislature had made that offense a crime pursuant to Md. Code Ann., Crim. Law § 3-310, he had been indicted for violating that offense, and the evidence sufficiently support his conviction for that offense.
|
|||||
| Eller v. Bolton, No. 692, SEPTEMBER TERM, 2004,
COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND, March 31, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court's judgment amending Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO) was vacated because it appeared it was not qualifiable since it provided for payment to person who was not an alternate payee under 29 U.S.C.S. § 1056(d)(3)(K); however, trial court retained jurisdiction to amend it to reflect intent of parties as indicated in consent order.
|
|||||
| Storetrax.com, Inc. v. Gurland, No. 418 & No. 1047, SEPTEMBER TERM, 2004,
COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND, March 31, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A genuine dispute of material fact existed as to a corporation's claim that it fired a director for cause, in the director's suit for breach of an employment contract, and the corporation was not judicially estopped from this claim. The director sufficiently notified the corporation of his severance pay claim and did not breach his fiduciary duty.
|
|||||
| Cruz v. State, No. 1417, SEPTEMBER TERM, 2005,
COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND, April 4, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Canine scan did not violate Fourth Amendment as dog and officer were lawfully were present at site of sniff; the officer and the dog had a right to stand outside the vehicle, which had been lawfully stopped for a traffic offense. In addition, window of vehicle was already open when dog jumped onto sill, and officer never instructed dog to jump.
|
|||||
| Mayor & City Council v. Bunting, No. 2484, September Term, 2004,
COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND, April 4, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in declaring that police officers of the rank of lieutenant or higher had the right to participate in collective bargaining, as allowing those officers to participate in bargaining would have created unresolvable conflicts of interest both between the city and its command staff and within the command staff itself.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
