 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re Brown, Misc. Docket No. 10, September Term, 2005,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, April 11, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The application of an applicant to the Maryland Bar was denied for failing to possess the requisite moral character required for admission where it was shown that the applicant failed to disclose a bank fraud conviction and job termination on his law school application and never satisfied the restitution he was ordered to pay for the fraud.
|
|||||
| In re Schwartz, Misc. Docket AG, No. 37, September Term, 2005,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, April 11, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Maslow v. Vanguri, No. 564, SEPTEMBER TERM, 2005,
COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND, April 11, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A patient's decision to appeal a jury verdict in a medical malpractice case, despite a no appeals clause in a high-low settlement agreement entered into by the parties, constituted a material breach of the agreement entitling the defendant doctor to recission.
|
|||||
| Perez v. State, No. 495, September Term, 2005,
COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND, April 11, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's third written statement and oral statement were not admissible as length of detention was inordinate; police had no reason not to present defendant to Commissioner as required by Md. R. 4-212, except to obtain incriminating statements; and defendant had been kept in solitary confinement for hours, was not given water, and was fed once.
|
|||||
| Siedlecki v. Employees' Ret. Sys., No. 433, September Term, 2005,
COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND, April 11, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Baltimore County, Md., Code § 23-58(a) allowed periodic medical examinations of a Baltimore County police officer, who retired on an accidental disability before reaching age 55 and before completing 20 years of creditable service, until that officer attained the age of 55.
|
|||||
| Surland v. State, No. 8, September Term, 2005, No. 45, September Term, 2005,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, April 11, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellate court erred in dismissing a deceased criminal defendant's appeal. In such situations, Md. R. 1-203(d)'s time limits had to be suspended to allow defendant's estate to appoint a substituted party to pursue the appeal; if no timely election to continue the appeal was made, the appeal would be dismissed and the conviction would stand.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
