 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Atty. Griev. Comm'n v. Hill, Misc. Docket (Subtitle AG) No. 77, September Term, 2005,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, March 21, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney was suspended for 30 days for violating Md. R. Prof. Conduct 1.3, 1.4, 8.1(b), and 8.4(d) after he did not prepare eligible domestic relations order for client one, and failed to timely prepare consent order and submitted it without allowing client two to review it as there were mitigating factors and attorney had expressed remorse.
|
|||||
| Haley v. State, No. 36, September Term, 2006,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, March 21, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Information defendant provided to defense counsel was covered by attorney-client privilege even though it later formed basis of defense. Officer had probable cause to arrest defendant after observing driver of car during crime and then again when executing arrest; thus, particularity of description of offender was based on first-person observation.
|
|||||
| Hall v. Univ. of Md. Med. Sys. Corp., No. 75, September Term, 2004,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, March 21, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred as a matter of a law by excluding two entries in baby's medical records on the grounds that they were hearsay; the entries met the requirements of the business records exception to the hearsay rule found in Md. R. 5-803(b)(6) and they were pathologically germane to the diagnosis or treatment of the baby.
|
|||||
| Dep't of Human Res., Child Care Admin. v. Roth, No. 22, September Term, 2004,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, March 22, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Controversy over whether the social welfare agency had the authority to revoke the day care provider's family day care registration became moot when relevant regulatory language of administrative regulations was amended to reflect that authority; thus, case had to be dismissed as moot pursuant to Md. R. 8-602(a)(10).
|
|||||
| Abrams v. Lamone, No. 142, September Term, 2005,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, March 26, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A candidate's admission to the Maryland Bar six years ago, coupled with his lengthy, but primarily, federal practice of law was insufficient to meet the requirements of Md. Const. art. V, § 4, as the constitutional provision's plain language required a candidate to have practiced law for 10 years, in Maryland, as a member of the Maryland Bar.
|
|||||
| State v. Mason, No. 1661, September Term, 2006,
COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND, March 27, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Detention of 25 minutes after traffic stop, for sole purpose of issuing warning for stop sign violation, was unreasonable, as warning officer wrote was not difficult exercise in composition and defendant's license and registration had been checked with the dispatcher before traffic stop was even made since stop was part of narcotics investigation.
|
|||||
| Brown v. Smith, No. 0929, September Term, 2005,
COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND, March 29, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly found that appellants trespassed on appellees' property by travelling over a farm lane to access a public road, but erred in awarding appellees $ 8,350 in nominal damages, as that award simply could not be justified as nominal under the circumstances.
|
|||||
| Jones v. State, No. 0540, September Term, 2005,
COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND, March 29, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Conviction for first-degree felony murder had to be reversed, as the State did not establish a causal connection between the robbery of the one victim and the later shooting of the second victim such that an inference could be drawn that the shooting of the second victim was in furtherance of the robbery of the first victim.
|
|||||
| Liddy v. Lamone, No. 71, September Term, 2006,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, March 29, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in denying appellees' motion to dismiss appellant's action challenging the qualifications under Md. Const. art. V, § 4, of a candidate for the position of Maryland Attorney General, as the action was barred by laches because the action was filed only 18 days before the general election.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
