 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Atty. Griev. Comm'n v. Christopher, Misc. Docket AG No. 60, September Term, 2006,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, April 11, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Forster v. Hargadon, Misc. No. 8, September Term, 2006,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, April 11, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: State's highest court dismissed public defender's petition for relief from trial court's directive regarding filing of exceptions in juvenile cases. Public defender was seeking extraordinary relief, but specific and adequate legal remedies were available to obtain it. Moreover, the issue was being considered in two pending state appeals.
|
|||||
| Jackson v. Pasadena Receivables, Inc., No. 106, September Term, 2006,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, April 11, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: South Dakota, the home state of the national bank, had a substantial relationship to the parties and the transaction. The court's analysis demonstrated that the requirement of Md. Code Ann., Com. Law § 12-503(e) did not represent a fundamental public policy sufficient to forsake the parties' choice of South Dakota law.
|
|||||
| Bereano v. State Ethics Comm'n, No. 2412, SEPTEMBER TERM, 2004,
COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND, April 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Maryland State Ethics Commission properly determined that a lobbyist knowingly and willingly violated Md. Code Ann., State Gov't § 15-713(1) because substantial evidence supported the Commission's finding that the lobbyist was engaged for lobbying purposes for compensation that was contingent upon executive or legislative action.
|
|||||
| Lewis v. State, No. 95, September Term, 2006,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, April 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in denying motion to suppress because police did not have justification to conduct investigatory traffic stop based upon fact defendant "almost" hit police car. Defendant was stopped and pulled into street, activating left turn signal; that defendant almost hit police car did not constitute traffic infraction or illegal activity.
|
|||||
| McNack v. State, No. 98, September Term, 2006,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, April 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Relatives of decedents who were killed by drug dealers in retaliation for reporting drug deals, as publicly urged by state and local governments, failed to state claim, since state did not recognize state-created-danger theory of constitutional violations and no special relationship existed to extend duty to protect public to special duty.
|
|||||
| Sapero v. Mayor of Baltimore, No. 72, September Term, 2006,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, April 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in granting city's petitions for immediate possession of property owner's properties, as Baltimore, Md., Code of Public Local Laws § 21-16 required that to allow such a "quick-take" condemnation, the city show why because of emergency it was in the public interest for city to take immediate possession and the city did not do so.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
