|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case
for free through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Maryland - June 8 - June 27, 2006
|
| |
|
| |
Fuller v. State, No. 147, September Term, 2005,
COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND, June 8, 2006, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Applicant's appeal of the trial court's denial, without a hearing, of applicant's post-sentence petition for commitment to the Alcohol and Drug Abuse Administration pursuant to Md. Code Ann., § 8-507 for treatment of his alcohol addiction was dismissed; no indication existed that the General Assembly intended that such a denial be appealable.
|
|
| |
Garg v. Garg, No. 97, September Term, 2005,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, June 8, 2006, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: UCCJA, not UCCJEA, applied to custody case, as it was filed before October 1, 2004. Special appeals court also erred in remanding case because trial court deferred ruling on motion to appoint counsel for minor child; there was no abuse of discretion, as issue was not urgent, given that child was with the wife, who did not raise the issue on appeal.
|
|
| |
Trembow v. Schonfeld, No. 64, September Term, 2005,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, June 8, 2006, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: A mother was not entitled to pursue a paternity action after a child's 18th birthday; however, had the mother established paternity prior to the child's 18th birthday, or the child had independently established the same, the mother or the child would have been entitled to seek child support from the alleged father of the destitute adult child.
|
|
| |
|
| |
State v. Wilkins, No. 65, September Term, 2005,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, June 9, 2006, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In murder case, sentencing judge's failure to recognize right to exercise discretion in imposition of sentence did not render life sentence illegal within meaning of Md. R. 4-345(a); sentence imposed was not illegal, and, therefore, alleged defect resulting from failure to acknowledge discretion to suspend sentence did not render it illegal.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|