 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. Testerman, No. 139, September Term, 2006,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, June 1, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Jones v. State, No. 851, September Term, 2005,
COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND, June 4, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in denying defendant's request, made on the day of trial, for a postponement to attempt to secure counsel; he had expressly waived his right to counsel three months before trial and at several proceedings thereafter, and he did not show that trial court's ruling thwarted the interest of justice, as Md. R. 4-215(b) required.
|
|||||
| Paulino v. State, No. 75, September Term, 2006,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, June 4, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Intermediate appellate court erred in affirming trial court's decision to deny petitioner's motion to suppress where he was subjected to a strip search and visual body cavity search based on an informant's tip; search violated his Fourth Amendment rights, as exigent circumstances were not present and such an intrusive search was thus unreasonable.
|
|||||
| Sterling v. Atl. Auto. Corp., No. 105, September Term, 2006,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, June 4, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: State supreme court dismissed employee's petition for writ of certiorari that the employee filed 19 days after the intermediate appellate court filed its mandate in her case; her petition was not timely filed because Md. R. 8-302(a) required that it be filed no later than 15 days after the mandate was issued, and that time limit not be extended.
|
|||||
| Owens v. State, No. 103, September Term, 2006,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, June 5, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Empaneling of noncitizen on jury did not abridge substantive due process right to a jury trial under Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments and Md. Const. Decl. Rights arts. 5(a)(1) and 24 and defendant waived his right under Md. Code Ann., Cts. & Jud. Proc. § 8-207(a) (2002) to a citizen jury by failing to propose venire questions about citizenship.
|
|||||
| Atty. Griev. Comm'n v. Ficker, Misc. AG No. 26, September Term, 2006,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, June 7, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney was indefinitely suspended, as he violated Md. R. Prof. Conduct 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 1.15(a), 5.1, and 8.4(d) through his incompetence, lack of diligence, failure to communicate with client, failure to supervise associate, mishandling of client funds, and conduct prejudicial to administration of justice, and he had history of similar violations.
|
|||||
| Boyd v. State, No. 30, September Term, 2006,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, June 7, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction for violating a protective order was reversed and remanded for a new trial because his general objections to the admissibility of evidence at trial preserved the issue for appellate review. Additionally, the admission of hearsay evidence and other bad acts evidence was erroneous under Md. R. 5-802 and Md. R. 5-404(b).
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
