 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Atty. Griev. Comm'n of Md. v. Stanback, Misc. Docket AG No. 71, September Term, 2006,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, July 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Dickens v. State, No. 1739, September Term, 2005,
COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND, July 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant's first-degree murder and use of a handgun in the commission of a felony convictions were affirmed where four text messages received on the victim's cell phone had been properly authenticated as originating from appellant, the messages were relevant to show premeditation, and no prejudice was shown by seemingly inconsistent verdicts.
|
|||||
| Murdock v. State, No. 2198, September Term, 2005,
COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND, July 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court properly ruled that no violation of Md. R. 4-263(a) occurred with regard to the State allegedly failing to disclose a victim's pretrial identification of defendant from a photographic array as the inconsistency issue at trial was a credibility issue, not a discovery violation issue, as to the information the victim gave a detective.
|
|||||
| Stanley v. Stanley, No. 1981, September Term, 2005,
COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND, July 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The right of withdrawal from a multiple-party account under Md. Code Ann., Fin. Inst. § 1-204(f) did not create an ownership interest in those funds that overrode the ownership interest of the other account survivors, thus, a trial court erred by granting summary judgment to the withdrawing survivors in a conversion and unjust enrichment suit.
|
|||||
| In re Julianna B., No. 2796, September Term, 2005,
COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND, July 3, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Juvenile who stabbed an unarmed girl was properly adjudicated delinquent because sufficient evidence supported second degree murder conviction and circuit court did not clearly err in finding that she deliberately inflicted fatal stab wound without subjective belief that she was in danger of serious injury under Md. Code Ann., Crim. Law § 3-201(d).
|
|||||
| Pettigrew v. State, No. 154, September Term, 2006,
COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND, July 3, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's first-degree assault conviction under Md. Code Ann., Crim. Law § 3-202(a)(1) was reversed for insufficient evidence because the trial court erred in giving jury an instruction on transferred intent where defendant, during a physical altercation with a co-worker, threw missiles that injured but did not kill a bystander employee.
|
|||||
| Randall v. Peaco, No. 852, September Term, 2006,
COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND, July 3, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment was affirmed as officer acted objectively reasonably when he shot an adult suffering from schizophrenia while performing community caretaking function as adult was unmedicated and holding 13-inch butcher knife as he approached officer, and another officer was positioned on his knees between the adult and the officer.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
