 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Dixon v. Dep't of Pub. Safety & Corr. Servs., No. 1107, September Term, 2006,
COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND, July 5, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court properly dismissed an inmate's tort claim against the Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services since Md. Code Ann., Corr. Servs. § 10-308(c) allowed the pursuit of such a claim against the State but, if such claim was pursued, the Sundry Claims Board was the exclusive avenue to obtain compensation.
|
|||||
| McNeill v. Md. Auto. Ins. Fund, No. 1056, September Term, 2006,
COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND, July 5, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in entering judgment for a state insurance fund as to appellant's action for injuries suffered in an auto accident, as an insurer did not notify the offending driver that he was not insured for a year following the accident, and thus appellant could not have complied withe the Md. Code Ann., Ins. § 20-603, notice requirement.
|
|||||
| State v. Copes, No. 1063, September Term, 2006,
COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND, July 5, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly granted summary judgment State on personal representative's survival action against State; personal representative did not timely submit claim within one year of date of injury to the person, as Md. Code Ann., State Gov't § 12-106(b)(1) required, since time ran from date decedent's leg was amputated, and not date of death.
|
|||||
| Archers Glen Ptnrs., Inc. v. Garner, No. 1281, September Term, 2006,
COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND, July 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in ordering matter of county planning board's approval of developer's preliminary plan be remanded to the county planning board for further findings; substantial evidence was presented that sufficiently supported county planning board's decision that developer's subdivision plan conformed to county's General Plan and Master Plan.
|
|||||
| In re Nicole B., No. 1378, September Term, 2006,
COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND, July 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court's judgment closing the child in need of assistance was vacated and the case involving placement of the two children was remanded to trial court for further proceedings; trial court failed to properly address "active efforts" to prevent break-up of the family as required under Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978, 25 U.S.C.S. § 1901 et seq.
|
|||||
| Rendelman v. State, No. 2616, September Term, 2005,
COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND, July 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence insufficiently supported defendant's convictions of extortion by economic threat and extortion in writing by economic threat; his threat to sue former employer even though made in bad faith was not wrongful under Md. Code Ann., Crim, Law § 3-701(b) and threat of litigation was not a wrongful mean under Md. Code Ann., Crim. Law § 3-706.
|
|||||
| Atty. Griev. Comm'n of Md. v. Goff, Misc. Docket AG No. 56, September Term, 2005,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, July 24, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Bubb v. Laws, No. 141, September Term, 2006,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, July 25, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Smith v. Danielczyk, No. 133, September Term, 2006,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, July 25, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defamation action against police investigators was improperly dismissed for failure to state a claim because the investigators' statements made in an application for a search warrant and to the media were not protected by an absolute privilege, but were subject to the common law qualified immunity possessed by public officials.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
