 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Abrams v. Lamone, No. 142, September Term, 2005,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, August 29, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Atty. Griev. Comm'n v. Sutton, No. Misc. AG 23, September Term, 2005, No. Misc. AG 24, September Term, 2005,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, August 29, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney's conduct in accepting fees from clients, and then failing to represent his clients diligently or competently, meant that he committed numerous violations of the Maryland Lawyers' Rules of Professional Conduct and, in order to protect the public, dictated that state's highest court accept bar counsel's recommendation that he be disbarred.
|
|||||
| Atty. Griev. Comm'n v. Lynt, Misc. Docket AG, No 17, September Term, 2006,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, August 30, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Fowler v. Motor Vehicle Admin., No. 111, September Term, 2005,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, August 30, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: ALJ's denial of driver's subpoena request was inappropriate because there was factual dispute regarding whether driver was fully advised of consequences of refusing breath test, as required by Md. Code Ann., Transp. § 16-205.1, or whether driver was misled by the officer's statements. ALJ also failed to provide indicated reason denying subpoena.
|
|||||
| City Neighbors Charter Sch. v. Balt. City Bd. of Sch. Comm'rs, No. 1598, September Term, 2005,
COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND, August 31, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Special appeals court vacated the trial court's judgment that had held state board of education's funding decision regarding public charter schools was moot; questions of how, pursuant to Md. Code Ann., Educ. § 9-109(a), "commensurate" funding of public charter schools was determined and disbursement of funds had ongoing, broad application.
|
|||||
| College Bowl, Inc. v. Mayor & City Council, No. 127, September Term, 2005,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, August 31, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A manufacturer did not qualify as a "displaced person" pursuant to Md. Code Ann., Real Prop. § 12-201(e), and was not entitled to compensation for relocation expenses; there was no evidence that termination of the manufacturer's tenancy was the direct result of a written notice by a city of its intent to acquire the property.
|
|||||
| Ruffin v. State, No. 86, September Term, 2005,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, August 31, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Special appeals court erred in affirming judgments of conviction entered against defendant; specific jury instruction trial court gave regarding reasonable doubt did not closely enough track Md. Pattern Jury Instructions Crim. No. 2:02, as it left out informing jury of duty to acquit if it was not satisfied of his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
