|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Maryland - August 3 - August 31, 2007
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
People's Counsel for Balt. County v. Surina, No. 111, September Term, 2006,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, August 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Because the Rural Conservation (R.C.) 2 and R.C. 5 zoning regulations did not conflict where the access road was designed to service identical permitted uses in both zones, and the road was a use permitted as of right in both zones according to Baltimore County, Md., Zoning Regulation §§ 1A01.2.B.5 and 1A04.2.A.7, there was no zoning impediment.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Patterson v. State, No. 83, September Term, 2006,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, August 24, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Intermediate appellate court's affirmance of denial of defendant's motion to suppress was affirmed; even though evidence supporting probable cause was stale, warrant was based on evidence sufficient to create judicial disagreement, and, thus, officers executing warrant were objectively reasonable in relying on it under Leon good-faith exception.
|
|
| |
Schade v. Md. State Bd. of Elections, No. 64, September Term, 2004,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, August 24, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: A trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying voters' request for a preliminary injunction seeking to decertify an electronic voting system purchased as the trial court found that the Maryland State Board of Elections acted reasonably, pursuant to Md. Code Ann., Elec. Law §§ 9-101 and 9-102, in certifying the system.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
