 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Neifert v. Dep't of the Env't, No. 10, September Term, 2006,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, November 14, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Lot owners' equal protection rights under U.S. Const. amend. XIV and Md. Const. Decl. Rights art. 24 were not violated. Policy delineating wetlands excluded from a sewer system when policy bore a rational relationship to state goals of fairness, fiscal integrity, and protection of ecological areas; no taking occurred as septic tanks were nuisances.
|
|||||
| Wilson v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., No. 22, September Term, 2006,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, November 14, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employer and insurer were entitled to include fellow employee exclusion in a business automobile liability insurance policy because the policy maintained the minimum coverage required by the compulsory insurance laws of Md. Code Ann., Ins. § 19-504 and Md. Code Ann., Transp. § 17-103 and the exclusion only applied for amounts greater than minimum.
|
|||||
| Jeandell v. State, No. 113, September Term, 2005,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, November 15, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Conviction for violating Md. Code Ann., Crim. Proc. § 11-721(a) by knowingly failing to notify the State of a change in residences as required by Md. Code Ann., Crim. Proc. § 11-705(d) was reversed because defendant was homeless and thus, no rational trier of fact could have concluded defendant had "residence" within meaning of § 11-705(d).
|
|||||
| Twine v. State, No. 138, September Term, 2005,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, November 15, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in concluding defendant, who was homeless and living wherever he could, violated Md. Code Ann., Crim. Proc. § 11-721 by failing to provide notice of change of address, as Md. Code Ann., Crim. Proc. § 11-705(d) required defendant to register change of residence and "residence" required he have fixed location at which he was living.
|
|||||
| Walzer v. Osborne, No. 20, September Term, 2006,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, November 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a medical malpractice suit, Md. Code Ann., Cts. & Jud. Proc. § 3-2A-04(b) was interpreted to mandate that the certificate of a qualified expert be completed, with an attesting expert report attached, and that dismissal of the claim without prejudice was the appropriate remedy when the claimant failed to attach the report in a timely manner.
|
|||||
| Atty. Griev. Comm'n v. Sweitzer, Misc. Docket AG No. 69, September Term, 2005,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, November 20, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney was indefinitely suspended from practice of law for violating Md. R. Prof. Conduct 1.3 by failing to act with reasonable diligence and promptness in recording a deed conveying land, and Md. R. Prof. Conduct 8.4(b) and (c) when he presented Gift Certification From containing forged signature of former wife to Motor Vehicle Administration.
|
|||||
| Allen v. State, No. 1805, September Term, 2004,
COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND, November 30, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Conviction for unauthorized use under Md. Code Ann., Crim. Law § 7-203 was upheld where Maryland had power to prosecute because vehicle was unlawfully "carried" into Maryland, and jury was permitted to discount defendant's explanation and to infer from recent, exclusive possession that he was involved in removing vehicle from Virginia dealership.
|
|||||
| In re Adoption of Harold H., No. 0464, September Term, 2006,
COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND, November 30, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Termination of mother's parental rights under Md. Code Ann., Fam. Law § 5-313, was affirmed as there no evidence of how mother, who suffered stroke, could maintain healthy and safe environment for minor while in nursing home, and mother exhibited symptoms of dementia, carried her own feces around, and walked away in the middle of a conversation.
|
|||||
| Lab. Corp. of Am. v. Hood, Misc. No. 1, September Term, 2006,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, December 1, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellate court answered certified questions concerning the choice of law in wrongful birth action by parents by finding that Maryland recognized an exception to the lex loci delicti rule, and that denying Maryland residents the right to bring a wrongful birth action by applying North Carolina law would violate the public policy of Maryland.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
