 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Atty. Griev. Comm'n v. Victor Mba-Jonas, Misc. Docket (Subtitle AG) No. 55, September Term, 2006,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, December 4, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A finding that an attorney violated Md. R. Prof. Conduct 8.1 was affirmed where the hearing judge found an investigator's testimony regarding the attorney's statements to be more credible. The appropriate sanction was a continuation of an indefinite suspension where the attorney's conduct was a continuation of previously sanctioned conduct.
|
|||||
| In re Reinstatement of Rose, Misc. Docket AG No. 39, September Term, 2007,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, December 5, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Atty. Griev. Comm'n of Md. v. Kalil, Misc. Docket (Subtitle AG) No. 27, September Term, 2006,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, December 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Exception to judge's finding was overruled as record did not show that judge's findings of fact pertaining to attorney's use of pseudonyms were clearly erroneous, and these facts supported the conclusion that attorney's use of alternate names did not rise to level necessary for a violation of Md. R. Prof. Conduct 8.4(c). Attorney was reprimanded.
|
|||||
| Maurer v. Pa. Nat'l Mut. Cas. Ins. Co., No. 131, September Term, 2006,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, December 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial judge's instruction concerning the principle that violations of statutes could be evidence of negligence, combined with instructions on Md. Code Ann., Transp. §§ 11.174.1 and 21-902(a)(2), constituted error where the insured was at all times a passenger in the automobile involved in the accident. Thus, the statutes did not apply.
|
|||||
| Parker v. State, No. 37, September Term, 2006,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, December 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: New suppression hearing was required to determine if there was violation of Maryland's "knock and announce" principle, under which propriety of "no-knock" entry was to be reviewed based on facts known at the time of entry. Conviction for possession of firearm was vacated, as there was no evidence connecting defendant to home where gun was found.
|
|||||
| Atty. Griev. Comm'n v. Saridakis, Misc. Docket AG No. 25, September Term, 2006,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, December 7, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Minh-Vu Hoang v. Hewitt Ave. Assocs., LLC, No. 1048, September Term, 2005,
COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND, December 7, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
