 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Donovan v. City of Woburn, No. 04-P-734,
APPEALS COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, January 13, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: By failing to tailor its inquiry and decision to limitations of applicant's agreement with zoning board and location where he planned to carry out his business, commission's denial of liquor license to applicant was arbitrary and capricious. Commission failed to identify danger it believed would accompany the applicant's delivery process.
|
|||||
| Friedmann v. Chang, Docket Number: 05-1167,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, AT MIDDLESEX, January 13, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a suit on promissory notes, defendant showed good cause to set aside a default under Mass. R. Civ. P. 55(c): (1) he failed to file an answer because he believed parties had negotiated a settlement, and (2) his claim that notes were procured through fraud was meritorious defense, since there was no record of the debts they were alleged to secure.
|
|||||
| Granite City Elec. Supply Co. v. LeBlanc, Docket Number: 04-0095,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, AT NORFOLK, January 13, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment of dismissal was entered as corporation issued 22 checks with its name as payor to supplier in disputed period. Checks by themselves might not have put supplier on notice that they were dealing with corporation, but pattern of checks lent circumstantial corroboration to testimony that corporation gave supplier notice of corporate status.
|
|||||
| The Harvard Crimson, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard College, SJC-09434,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, January 13, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: University newspaper was not entitled to mandatory disclosure under Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 66, § 10 of documents in possession of university police department as it was not transformed into an agency of the Commonwealth simply because some officers had been appointed special state police officers under Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 22C, § 63.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
