|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case
for free through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Massachusetts - January 12, 2007
|
| |
Balyozian v. City of Somerville, Opinion No.: 97425, Docket Number: 05-02707,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, AT MIDDLESEX, January 12, 2007, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Had auctioneer earned a commission under his contract with a city, the contract price would have exceeded $25,000; therefore, it was subject to the competitive sealed bidding processes of Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 30B, § 5. As the city did not engage in these processes, the contract was unenforceable and the auctioneer's breach of contract suit failed.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Commonwealth v. Childs, Opinion No.: 97652, Docket Number: 06-381,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, AT NORFOLK, January 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where defendant was released pursuant to Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 276, §§ 58A or 87, his release was revoked and he was held without bail because there was corroborated evidence that he solicited a former jail cell mate to murder his former girlfriend, and his conduct gave rise to a rebuttable presumption of dangerousness which he did not rebut.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Cronin v. Teamsters Union Local 25, Int'l Bhd. of Teamsters, Opinion No.: 96944, Docket Number: 04-1132-B,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, AT WORCESTER, January 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Union and editor's summary judgment motion was denied as to union member's invasion of privacy claim under Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 214, § 1B, as member was private individual, and there was no public interest served by disclosure of his pension information. Whether disclosure violated member's right to privacy was fact issue for jury.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|