|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case
for free through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Massachusetts - January 17, 2006
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Classic Suites & Inns, Inc. v. McCormick, Docket Number: 04-2416A,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, AT WORCESTER, January 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Owner's motel permit was suspended for violating town's motel regulations. The regulations did not violate the Massachusetts Home Rule Amendment, Mass. Const. amend. art. II, § 6; as they were not inconsistent with state's constitution or legislation, the town's board of selectmen did not exceed its authority in adopting them.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Commonwealth v. Peterson, SJC-09482,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, January 17, 2006, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Since Mas. Gen. Laws ch. 263, § 4A, did not require that a waiver be in writing, and the waiver, which was given orally after an extensive colloquy, was made voluntarily and intelligently, proceeding by way of complaint did not render defendant's trial invalid.
|
|
| |
Currier v. Bd. of Selectmen of Sutton, Docket Number: 2005-01682-B,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, AT WORCESTER, January 17, 2006, Decided , January 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Preliminary injunction requiring town to continue paying firefigher under Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 41, § 111F was continued where firefighter was incapacitated for duty based on physicians' opinions, colleagues' observations, and the physical nature of his employment.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|