 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Adoption of Elena, SJC-09586,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, January 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial judge gave due consideration to whether mother's unfitness was temporary. There was ample evidence children would suffer if returned to custody of mother; among other things, mother had long history of involvement with drugs and abusive men and did nothing that was asked of her in terms of counseling and rehabilitation for over six moths.
|
|||||
| Bessette v. Steele, Docket Number: BRCV2004-00885,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, AT BRISTOL, January 31, 2006, Decided , January 31, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Daughters were entitled to summary judgment in breach of contract action. Although mother, before her death, purported to convey remainder interest in property to son, mother was bound by agreement with father that called for distribution of proceeds from premises to daughters and son, and son had actual notice of this agreement.
|
|||||
| Corrado v. Hedrick, No. 05-P-287,
APPEALS COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, January 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the trial judge found that abuse had not occurred but he extended abuse prevention orders to keep plaintiff and the fiance apart pending resolution of a property dispute, the trial judge erred. Where abuse under Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 209A, § 1 had not occurred, the remedies under Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 209A, § 3 were unavailable.
|
|||||
| Lichtenfeld v. Bucknum, Docket Number: 05-2205,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, AT MIDDLESEX, January 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Shareholder lacked requisite standing to bring derivative because no admissible evidence contradicted the legal presumption that the corporation's board acted reasonably and in good faith when it voted not to pursue litigation against corporate officers after they sold their stock before announcing that a drug was being withdrawn from the market.
|
|||||
| Pro Con, Inc. v. J&B Drywall, Inc., Docket Number: 03-2063-C,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, AT WORCESTER, January 31, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Contractor's claim for tort recovery against insulation manufacturer was precluded by the economic loss doctrine since the insulation became an integral component of hotel's wall system and the underlying basis of bargain was the construction of the hotel, not the use of insulation by itself; thus contractor's claim for contribution also failed.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
