 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bottalico v. Souza, Docket Number: 04-1194,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, AT WORCESTER, February 3, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Abutters of a proposed subdivision had standing as parties aggrieved under Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 41, § 81BB to challenge the City of Leominster Planning Board's approval of developers' definitive subdivision plan and waiver of a regulation due to a diminution in their property values, their obstructed view, and their abutter status.
|
|||||
| Commonwealth v. Connolly, Docket Number: 05-1059C,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, AT WORCESTER, February 3, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The Commonwealth's petition to have a prisoner declared to be a sexually dangerous person pursuant to Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 123A, §§ 1 and 14, was denied because the Commonwealth failed to show that the prisoner was likely to reoffend, as the prisoner had made good progress in his sex offender treatment.
|
|||||
| Lee v. Daniel, Docket Number: MICV2004-4428,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, AT MIDDLESEX, February 3, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Partial summary judgment in favor of the creditor was granted because the creditor established the indebtedness to her by the debtors by virtue of her status as a judgment creditor, and the creditor was entitled to proceed against the property interest which the debtors maintained in their lawsuit against their former counsel.
|
|||||
| Quazi v. Barnstable County, Docket Number: 04-1747-C,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, AT WORCESTER, February 3, 2006, Decided , February 3, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: County's summary judgment motion was granted in an employee's action alleging that the county violated the Massachusetts Whistleblower Act, Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 149, § 185, when it terminated the employee, as the employee failed to provide the county with written notice of the suit as required by the statute, and no exemption applied.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
