 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Alfeo v. Dinsmore, No. 05-P-1678,
APPEALS COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, February 16, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment for buyer was affirmed as buyer complied with mortgage financing clause by applying for loan with licensed mortgage lender, even though it used table funding. Lender processed mortgage applications, underwrote loans, and made credit determinations in accordance with industry standards, and behaved as conventional mortgage lender.
|
|||||
| Commonwealth v. Casimir, No. 06-P-420.,
APPEALS COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, February 16, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: When defendant said he did not receive an "immigration warning" under Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 278, § 29D, upon admitting sufficient facts to warrant a conviction for cocaine possession, he was not entitled to vacate his plea or to a new trial because he did not show removal proceedings had been started against him or that he was denied naturalization.
|
|||||
| Loveday v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., Opinion No.: 97135, Docket Number: 05-01384,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, AT BRISTOL, February 16, 2007, Decided , February 16, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the court could not substitute its judgment for that of the Hearing Examiner, whose decision was carefully crafted and articulately reasoned according to the prescribed risk factors of the governing statute and regulations, it had to find for the Sex Offender Registry Board which had classified a 19-year-old as a Level II Sex Offender.
|
|||||
| Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am. v. Grant, Opinion No.: 97137, Docket Number: 05-2234,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, AT SUFFOLK, February 18, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an interpleader action concerning insurance funds, a summary judgment motion by the decedent's girlfriend was denied, as credibility issues concerning testimony by the decedent's manager that the decedent named the girlfriend as beneficiary and authorized the manager to sign decedent's name on the document raised a triable issue of fact.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
