 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Cameron v. Mass. State Police, Opinion No.: 97275, Docket Number: 00-4582,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, AT MIDDLESEX, February 22, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because there were disputed facts as to whether an employer retaliated against an employee for participating in a protected activity, the employer was not entitled to summary judgment on the employee's Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 151B retaliation claim.
|
|||||
| Commonwealth v. Stegemann, No. 05-P-738,
APPEALS COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, February 22, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion to suppress should have been granted because affidavit in support of search warrant did not establish probable link between defendant's residence and his drug enterprise; nothing in affidavit suggested drugs would be found in defendant's apartment rather than elsewhere six days after controlled buy that took place at informant's residence.
|
|||||
| Policastro v. City of Boston, Opinion No.: 97502, Docket Number: 04-4279C,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, AT SUFFOLK, February 22, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a resident filed an action challenging the constitutionality of a sale of urban renewal land to an Islamic society and its trust more than 16 months after the challenged sale, and more than 15 months after the applicable 30-day statute of limitations had run, the resident's challenge was time-barred by Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 121A.
|
|||||
| Qiuyue Shao v. Yue Ma, No. 06-P-1439,
APPEALS COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, February 22, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Dismissal of the wife's complaint for division of marital property was improper. Both parties conceded that the probate court had jurisdiction to assign their property interests, and having personal jurisdiction over the husband, the probate court could consider property both in and out of the Commonwealth.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
