 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Carrioulo v. Falmouth Conservation Comm'n, Docket Number: 2004-231-A,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, AT BARNSTABLE, March 2, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Conservation commission's denial of a variance to allow driveway construction work within 25 feet of a salt marsh was affirmed. Commission expressed a reasoned and tailored basis for its exercise of discretion in refusing to grant property owner a variance from enforcement of Falmouth, Mass., Wetlands Regs. § 10:18(7).
|
|||||
| Commonwealth v. Laguer, No. 05-P-155,
APPEALS COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, March 2, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Superior court did not err in denying defendant's new trial motion as he did not establish that a substantial basis existed for claiming prejudice from nondisclosure of fingerprint report as report did not contain information that would have cast doubt on victim's positive identification of him, and it did not clear him from involvement in attack.
|
|||||
| Commonwealth v. Perry, No. 04-P-106,
APPEALS COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, March 2, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence supported unlawful entry element of armed burglary because once defendant threatened to kill neighbor, he could not believe he still had permission to enter neighbor's home; and his prior concurrent sentences met the twice committed requirement of habitual offender statute where separate mittimuses showed he was committed on each sentence.
|
|||||
| Ford v. Gosselin, Docket Number: 05-00010,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, AT BARNSTABLE, March 2, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Revocation of Class A firearms license due to incident where licensee threatened city employees was supported by reasonable grounds pursuant to Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 140, § 131. Lower court erred in reinstating the license based primarily on fact that licensee was not convicted of crime and was not prohibited from possessing license was error.
|
|||||
| New Bedford v. Goldblatt, Docket Number: 04-1415,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, AT BRISTOL, March 2, 2006, Decided , March 2, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Commission's modification of termination of employee was vacated under Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 30A, § 14(7) as employee was subject to last chance agreement and was insubordinate when he responded to supervisor's discovery of his and his crew being found sitting down on job by turning back on supervisor and making pretense of work.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
