 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Birudavol v. Bd. of Registration in Med., SJC-09745,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, April 13, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Indefinite suspension of a doctor's license to practice medicine, with a stay based on the doctor's entry into a five-year probationary agreement, was not excessive as the doctor had provided substandard care to four patients and the probationary agreement allowed the doctor to continue to practice medicine with monitoring.
|
|||||
| Commonwealth v. Butler, No. 05-P-1123,
APPEALS COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, April 13, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was not entitled to dismissal under Mass.R.Crim.P. 36 of rape charges as while defendant was arraigned on May 6, 1999, and not tried until May 5, 2003, defendant was not prejudiced by the delay because, inter alia, the trial court gave defendant a lesser sentence than requested by the Commonwealth, taking the delay into consideration.
|
|||||
| Commonwealth v. McDermott, SJC-09130,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, April 13, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion to suppress. A five-minute warrantless entry into defendant's apartment was justified by a detective's concern that defendant might have harmed others before shooting seven people at his workplace, and a warrant authorizing a search for records permitted the seizure of computers and disks.
|
|||||
| Lowenstern v. Epoch Corp., Opinion No.: 97773, Docket Number: 01-0976,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, AT MIDDLESEX, April 13, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Corporation's summary judgment motion in landowners' breach of contract claim was denied because, although the landowners were not parties to the contract, it was unclear whether they were intended beneficiaries of the contract, and thus it could not have been said as a matter of law that they were not permitted to bring suit thereon.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
