 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Dworman v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., Docket Number: 02-1213B,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, AT WORCESTER, April 5, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Insurer two's summary judgment motion was denied as its policy was amended to conform to Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 175, § 113L(5), which prohibited stacking. While both insurers' policies provided UIM coverage, the insured could only recover from the policy providing the highest limits of such coverage, which was insurer two's policy.
|
|||||
| Fray-Witzer v. Metro. Antiques, LLC, Docket Number: 02-5827 BLS1,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, AT SUFFOLK, April 5, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a class action charging a company with violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C.S. § 227, the company's motion for summary judgment was denied because the company was a person under the law which, through its agent, caused the junk facsimiles to be transmitted to recipients in the United States from facilities in Canada.
|
|||||
| O'Brien v. Furlong, Docket Number: 02-1659B,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, AT WORCESTER, April 5, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trustee's handwritten letters with accompanying documentation (i.e., invoices) on what the trust paid to establish the former property owner's liability for costs incurred after the settlement agreement were sufficient to account for reimbursement monies the owner owed to the trust for the additional costs.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
