LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Massachusetts - May 11 - May 14, 2007

  
Britton v. Britton, No. 06-P-275, APPEALS COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, May 11, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: In a post-judgment divorce appeal, a trial court did not abuse its discretion in awarding alimony to the wife, which amounted to approximately 40 percent of the husband's total gross income, since the trial judge weighed the factors under Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 208, § 34 in fashioning the award and noted the wife's long-time absence from employment.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Lambert v. Fleet Nat'l Bank, SJC-09762, SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, May 11, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Because the undisputed facts disclosed that plaintiff mortgagor's Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 93A action was filed on April 18, 2000, which was over four years after defendant bank refused to renew a loan to plaintiff, plaintiff's ch. 93A action was untimely and barred by the four-year limitations period applicable via Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 260, § 5A.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Merlino v. Town of Foxborough, Opinion No.: 98954, Docket Number: 2004-1443-C, SUPERIOR COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, AT SUFFOLK, May 11, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: When an alleged injured party sued a town, its police officers, and a football team for tort claims, disqualification of the attorney and law firm representing all defendants was not required because no conflict of interest necessitated such disqualification as the football team was liable for all costs and for any judgment against any defendant.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Commonwealth v. Hector H., No. 06-P-739, APPEALS COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, May 14, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Juvenile's appeal from an order revoking probation was moot because delinquent adjudications based on his admissions constituted convictions which submerged or subsumed the effects of an earlier revocation of probation based on the same misconduct, and the admissions conclusively validated the earlier findings of probation violations.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Commonwealth v. Roxbury Charter High Pub. Sch., No. 06-P-733, APPEALS COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, May 14, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Substantial evidence supported the revocation of a charter school's charter under Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 71, § 89(kk) as there was a shortfall between its enrollment and the projections supporting its application, it failed to develop individual learning plans, it was not handicapped accessible, and its special education program was inadequate.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
DiPietro v. Sipex Corp., No. 06-P-758., APPEALS COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, May 14, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Former employer was improperly awarded summary judgment on a former employee's breach of contract claims because disputes of material fact existed as to whether the employee resigned with good reason, whether the employer terminated the employment without cause, and whether the employer fraudulently induced the employee to sign a promissory note.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re McBride, SJC-09571, SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, May 14, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: By misrepresenting his authority to settle a client's case, by depositing settlement funds in his own account, by neglecting his clients' cases to their detriment, and by failing to make full restitution of sums owed a client, an attorney violated multiple rules governing professional conduct and was therefore properly disbarred.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re Trusts Under the Will of Crabtree, SJC-09787, SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, May 14, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Where trustees committed a breach of their fiduciary duties when they used one of several trusts for the payment of their fees earned on all trusts, and they set up an endowment with proceeds from one trust without authorization, they were properly removed as trustees from all of the trusts.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Maimaron v. Commonwealth, SJC-09728, SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, May 14, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court properly granted summary judgment to police officer on his claim Commonwealth violated a duty owed to him by not defending him in assignee's state statutory tort claims act case against him; duty was owed under Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 258, § 9A and Commonwealth could have sought reimbursement later on if that law was found not to apply.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.