 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bateman v. Commonwealth, SJC-09957,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, June 21, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because defendant did not comply with Mass. Sup. Jud. Ct. R. 2:21 by setting forth the reasons why review of an interlocutory decision could not be obtained on appeal from a final adverse judgment or by other available means, his Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 211, § 3 motions to dismiss the indictments were properly denied without a hearing.
|
|||||
| Dube v. Lanphear, No. 06-P-713.,
APPEALS COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, June 21, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Three friends were not liable, under the social host liability doctrine, for injuries caused by an intoxicated driver because the friends could not be deemed social hosts where they did not regulate the liquor supply. Sharing a check at a bar was not the equivalent of being a host. The friends owed the injured driver no duty.
|
|||||
| Johnston v. Commonwealth, SJC-09933,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, June 21, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Leo v. Commonwealth, SJC-09655,
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, June 21, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because defendant pleaded guilty to all charges against him and was sentenced to life in prison, his request for a reduction in bail under Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 211, § 3 was moot, and the appeal was dismissed.
|
|||||
| Vassalluzzo v. Ernst & Young. LLP, Opinion No.: 98951, Docket Number: 06-4215-BLS2,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, AT SUFFOLK, June 21, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Law firm's motion to compel arbitration of a taxpayer's claims was denied because the law firm could not invoke the doctrine of equitable estoppel to enforce an arbitration provision, pursuant to Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 251, § 1, in an agreement between the taxpayer and an accounting firm, which agreement the law firm did not sign.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
